Gen3 would be future proof since the additional pins will allow more feature and services to be available (these pins are reserved for future use, meaning the services could be in development as we interact). The amount and gen of the interface does not affect the bandwidth/speed of the transfer the device can handle. The difference between the m.2 interface in the Skylake vs Broadwell NUC would be the pin layout and amount of pins available. Over provisioning enabled on the 950 for the full suggested 47GB (10%)
#Crystal diskmark 950 pro drivers#
Latest updates / drivers installed, the driver for the 950 is downloaded from Samsung 500GB Crucial MX200 attached to the SATA interface Samsung 950 Pro 512 GB attached to the M.2 interface Is there anyone who could shed some light on this? And is anybody getting the maximum speed out of this (or a like) combination? Another performance measurement tool like CrystalDiskMark gets numbers in the same area. It does not look like a temperature throttling issue, as the measurement is taken right after a cold boot. So the expected write speed is met, but the read speed lags behind. On my NUC Samsung Magician reports 1706 MB/s read and1558 MB/s write. I have seen this drive do this on an Asus H170 motherboard. The Samsung 950 pro drive should be able to use that interface to the max, resulting in a sequential read speed of around 2500 MB/s, and a sequential write speed of around 1500 MB/s. Not that I am really dissatisfied with the speed of above mentioned combination as it is faster than anything else in my office, I still have a question about this.ĪFAIK the NUC Skylake series has a PCIe 3.0, 4x M.2 interface.
0 kommentar(er)
